The case is listed as Re Grand Juries.  The question involves a lawyer’s and his client’s conversations.  “Privileged” communication between lawyer and client is protected or recused.  What criterion do we use to judge whether a communication is “more” or less p

The second lawyer is asked about a difficult case with utterly entangled conversations, the “tie goes to the runner.”  Now judge has to decide which is most important to decide on privilege.  That’s a lot of work on the judge.  The Chief Justice said he worried that the effort to to label rather than analyze.  He suggested that the correct question is whether something is important.  Go to audio recording>>>